May 31, 2010
---------------------
Monday
>>>Welcome visitor, you're not logged in.
Login   Subscribe Now!
Home User Management About Us Chinese
  Bookmark   Download   Print
Search:  serch "Fabao" Window Font Size: Home PageHome PageHome Page
 
No.1 of the Second Group of Model Cases regarding Guaranteeing People's Livelihood Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Wang Shurong v. He Fuyun, Wang Xisheng, et al. (case of dispute over rural land)
最高人民法院公布保障民生第二批典型案例之一:王淑荣与何福云、王喜胜等农村土地承包经营权纠纷案
【法宝引证码】
 
  
No.1 of the Second Group of Model Cases regarding Guaranteeing People's Livelihood Issued by the Supreme People's Court: Wang Shurong v. He Fuyun, Wang Xisheng, et al. (case of dispute over rural land) 最高人民法院公布保障民生第二批典型案例之一:王淑荣与何福云、王喜胜等农村土地承包经营权纠纷案
1. Basic Facts 基本案情
On October 30, 2007, the Rural Land Contracting Arbitral Commission of Taobei District, Baicheng City, Jilin Province rendered a ruling that Wang Shurong was entitled to the contractual management of the land that was cultivated by Wang Zhenxue. Wang Zhenxue, Plaintiff in the first instance, requested the People's Court of Taobei District to confirm that: (1) the contract on land contractual management entered into between the Villagers' Committee of Sanyue Village and Wang Zhenxue was valid; and (2) Wang Shurong was not entitled to the contractual management of the land that was contracted by Wang Zhenxue. Wang Shurong argued that she had one fifth of the right to the contractual management of the land that was contracted by Wang Zhenxue. Wang Shurong was married on January 25, 1975. Since her husband was a serviceman, her permanent residence was still registered under Wang Zhenxue's household. In 1982, when Sanyue Village contracted out land, Wang Shurong and Wang Zhenxue were family members in the same household. The five family members contracted 5.4 mu of land, 1.08 mu per person and the head of the contract household was Wang Zhenxue. In January 1992, Wang Shurong relocated her permanent residence to Baicheng City and obtained a non-agricultural hukou. In the second round of land contracting in 1997, the household of Wang Zhenxue undertook 4.82 mu of land and obtained the Rural Land Contractual Management Certificate in 2005. Wang Shurong was not recorded as a co-owner. 2007年10月30日,吉林省白城市洮北区农村土地承包仲裁委员会作出裁决:王淑荣对王振学所种土地享有承包经营权。一审原告王振学遂向洮北区人民法院请求:1、确认三跃村村委会与王振学签订的土地承包经营合同有效;2、确认王淑荣对王振学承包的土地无承包经营权。王淑荣答辩称其在王振学承包的土地中享有五分之一的承包经营权。王淑荣1975年1月25日结婚,由于其丈夫是军人,故户口仍在王振学家。1982年,三跃村发包土地时,王淑荣与王振学一家系同一家庭成员,5口人承包5.4亩地,人均1.08亩,承包户户主为王振学。王淑荣的户口于1992年1月迁入白城市并转为非农业户口。1997年第二轮土地承包时,王振学家承包4.82亩土地,并于2005年取得《农村土地承包经营权证》,共有人没有记载王淑荣。
Wang Zhenxue died in October 2010 and the respondent was altered from Wang Zhenxue to He Fuyun (wife of Wang Zhenxue) and Wang Xidong and Wang Xisheng (sons of Wang Zhenxue). 王振学于2010年10月死亡,被申请人由王振学变更为其妻何福云、其子王喜东、王喜胜。
The court of first instance rendered a judgment that: (1) the land contract entered into between Wang Zhenxue and the Villagers' Committee was legally valid; and (2) Wang Shurong was not entitled to the contractual management of 1.08 mu of land that was contracted by Wang Zhenxue. The court of second instance, the Intermediate People's Court of Baicheng City rendered a judgment that Wang Shurong's appeal should be dismissed and the original judgment should be sustained. After retrial, the Intermediate People's Court of Baicheng City rendered a judgment that: (1) the judgment of second instance and item (2) of the judgment of first instance should be revoked; and (2) item (1) of the judgment of first instance should be sustained. In December 2009, the High People's Court of Jilin Province rendered a ruling to dismiss the application of Wang Shurong for retrial. In June 2012, after the case was tried directly by the High People's Court of Jilin Province, the court rendered a judgment that: (1) the judgments of both first instance and second instance and the original civil judgment on retrial should be revoked; and (2) the claims of Wang Zhenxue should be dismissed. 一审法院判决:1、王振学与村委会签订的土地承包合同有效;2、王淑荣对王振学承包的土地不享有1.08亩承包经营权。白城中院二审判决:驳回王淑荣的上诉,维持原判。白城中院再审后判决:1、撤销二审判决和一审判决第二项;2、维持一审判决第一项。2009年12月吉林高院裁定驳回王淑荣的再审申请。2012年6月吉林高院提审后判决:1、撤销一、二审判决及原再审民事判决;2、驳回王振学的诉讼请求。
2. Adjudication 裁判结果
...... ......



Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com


 


您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区,如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户,请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询;
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com


     
     
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝www.lawinfochina.com
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code!
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials.
 
Home | Products and Services | FAQ | Disclaimer | Chinese | Site Map
©2012 Chinalawinfo Co., Ltd.    database@chinalawinfo.com  Tel: +86 (10) 8268-9699  京ICP证010230-8