*尊敬的用户，您好！本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务，如需整篇翻译，请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com，或致电86 (10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service, please contact us at:  + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com
 

   Beijing Tianying Jiuzhou Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. Beijing Sina Internet Information Service Co., Ltd. (appeal case regarding dispute over copyright infringement and unfair competition)
(appeal case regarding dispute over copyright infringement and unfair competition)

北京天盈九州网络技术有限公司与北京新浪互联信息服务有限公司侵犯著作权及不正当竞争纠纷上诉案

[Key Terms] film work ; originality ; common channel signal ; continuous image

[核心术语] 电影作品；独创性；公用信号；连续画面

[Disputed Issues] If continuous images carried by a common channel signal do not meet the prerequisites for film production and originality, such continuous images should not constitute a film work.

[争议焦点] 公用信号所承载连续画面不符合电影作品的固定要件和独创性时，该连续画面不构成电影作品。

[Case Summary] The prerequisite for film production is that there must be a medium for its shooting or to say a film work must have been fixedly stored in a certain tangible carrier. Common channel signal is a general term used in sports match livestreaming industry and the content thereof is not totally equivalent to what is viewed by the audience on screen. The comments and commentary in the material shown to the audience are unrelated to the common channel signal. If continuous images are to be produced into a film work...

[案例要旨] 电影作品的固定要件是“摄制在一定介质上”电影作品应已经稳定地固定在有形载体上。公用信号是体育赛事直播行业的通用术语其内容并不完全等同于观众在电视上所看到的内容。通常观众看到内容中的点评、解说与公用信号无关。连续画面属于电影作品时其独创性强调个性化的选择...

【法宝引证码】        北大法宝www.lawinfochina.com