May 31, 2010
---------------------
Monday
>>>Welcome visitor, you're not logged in.
Login   Subscribe Now!
Home User Management About Us Chinese
  Bookmark   Download   Print
Search:  serch "Fabao" Window Font Size: Home PageHome PageHome Page
 
Gao Xingyu et al. v. Tianjin Science and Technology Press Co., Ltd. (case regarding dispute over copyright infringement)
高兴宇等诉天津科学技术出版社有限公司侵害著作权纠纷案
【法宝引证码】
*尊敬的用户,您好!本篇仅为该案例的英文摘要。北大法宝提供单独的翻译服务,如需整篇翻译,请发邮件至database@chinalawinfo.com,或致电86 (10) 8268-9699进行咨询。
*Dear user, this document contains only a summary of the respective judicial case. To request a full-text translation as an additional service, please contact us at:  + 86 (10) 8268-9699 database@chinalawinfo.com
 
 
   Gao Xingyu et al. v. Tianjin Science and Technology Press Co., Ltd. (case regarding dispute over copyright infringement)
(case regarding dispute over copyright infringement)
高兴宇等诉天津科学技术出版社有限公司侵害著作权纠纷案

[Key Terms] original in content ; works ; substantial similarity
[核心术语] 内容独创性;作品;实质性相似

[Disputed Issues] Works that are not original in content shall not be protected by the Copyright Law.
[争议焦点] 内容不具有独创性的作品不受著作权法保护。

[Case Summary] Only the works that are of originality shall be protected by the Copyright Law. Originality means that a work is created from independent thinking and brain labor; specifically the work must be creative in either expression or typesetting...
[案例要旨] 只有具有独创性的作品才能受到著作权法的保护。作品的独创性是指作品所具有的作者独立思考和劳动特性...

Full-text omitted.

 

高兴宇等诉天津科学技术出版社有限公司侵害著作权纠纷案

 最高人民法院
 民事判决书
 (2016)最高法民申1647号
 再审申请人(一审原告、二审被上诉人):高兴宇。
 被申请人(一审被告、二审上诉人):天津科学技术出版社有限公司。
 法定代表人:蔡颢,该公司社长。
 一审被告:山东新华书店集团有限公司日照分公司。
 法定代表人:秦玉山,该分公司总经理。
 再审申请人高兴宇因与被申请人天津科学技术出版社有限公司(简称天津科学技术出版社)、一审被告山东新华书店集团有限公司日照分公司侵害著作权纠纷一案,不服山东省高级人民法院(2015)鲁民三终字第30号民事判决,向本院申请再审。本院依法组成合议庭对本案进行了审查,现已审查终结。
 高兴宇申请再审称:(一)一审判决只是认定“被告涉案文章部分内容抄袭了原告的文章”,并未指出“飞机晚点事例”为抄袭行为,但二审法院却以“原审法院认定‘飞机晚点事例'具有独创性进而认定被控侵权文章中该事例系抄袭高兴宇涉案文章错误”为由予以改判,在认定事实和适用法律方面均存在错误。(二)《社会心理效应的哲理启示》中“飞机晚点事例”作为有效证据必须具备两点:一是该书作者关于“飞机晚点事例”为自己原创的声明或证明;二是该书作者对天津科学技术出版社的授权。该证据不具备上述两点,但二审法院却采信该证据而认定涉案作品中的“飞机晚点事例”不具有独创性,属于认定的基本事实缺乏证据证明。(三)审判人员审理该案时涉嫌徇私舞弊,枉法裁判。依据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》第二百条第(二)、(六)、(十三)项之规定,请求本院依法撤销二审判决第五项,维持一审判决,判令天津科学技术出版社负担二审期间的合理开支4000元,并维持一、二审判决其他判项。
 ......



Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com


 


您好:您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区,如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录,进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息;如您还不是我们 的英文用户,请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询;
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com


     
     
【法宝引证码】        北大法宝www.lawinfochina.com
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
Confirmation Code:
Click image to reset code!
 
  Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.

Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.

We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve the quality of our materials.
 
Home | Products and Services | FAQ | Disclaimer | Chinese | Site Map
©2012 Chinalawinfo Co., Ltd.    database@chinalawinfo.com  Tel: +86 (10) 8268-9699  京ICP证010230-8