Zhu Yongsheng v. Shiping Company (Dispute over Compensation for Personal Injury)
[Judgment Abstract]
Under Article 14 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of Laws in the Trial of Cases Involving Compensation for Personal Injuries, helper relationship refers to a legal relationship between a helper and a helped party where the helper gratuitously handles affairs for the helped party. If the helper suffers personal injuries when handling the helped party's affairs, the helped party shall be held liable for compensation.
[Basic Facts]
Plaintiff: Zhu Yongsheng, male, 39, farmer, dwelling at Shuanghu Village, Jianxin Township, Dongzhi County, Anhui Province.
Defendant: Shiping LPG Limited Liability Company in Dongzhi County, Anhui Province, domiciled at Yaodu Town, Dongzhi County, Anhui Province.
Legal Representative: Zhou Shiping, manager of the Company.
Zhu Yongsheng (plaintiff, Zhu hereafter) brought a lawsuit with the People's Court of Dongzhi County, Anhui Province (hereinafter referred to as Dongzhi County Court) against Shiping LPG Limited Liability Company in Dongzhi County (hereinafter referred to as Shiping Company) due to a dispute over compensation for personal injury.
Zhu alleged that, he was a hired worker of Shiping Company. On August 5, 2003, the LPG tank at Qian Yueying's (Shiping Company's customer, Qian hereafter) home could not be lit up, and Qian asked Shiping Company's subordinate LPG station at the land bureau to send someone to repair the LPG tank. Zhu was at this LPG station at that moment, and after hearing of the matter, he said that Qian's LPG tank was tested by him. Shen Gelian, person-in-charge of the LPG station, immediately said to Zhu: “Since Qian's LPG tank was tested by you, you should go to repair it.” So Zhu went to Qian's home to repair the LPG tank, but met with a combustion accident during the repair, and was injured. He was authenticated to be at the disability of Grade 9. Since Zhu was hired by Shiping Company and was injured in his work, he pleaded the court to order Shiping Company to compensate his medical expenses, loss due to missed working time, nursing costs, traffic expenses, accommodation expenses, in-hospital food subsidy, and nutrition expenses, with the total amount at 9,717.90 yuan, and to compensate 17,250.84 yuan of his disability subsidy.
Zhu provided the following items of evidence:
| | 朱永勝訴世平公司人身損害賠償糾紛案
【裁判摘要】
根據最高人民法院《關于審理人身損害賠償案件適用法律若幹問題的解釋》第十四條的規定，幫工關系是指幫工人無償為被幫工人處理事務而在雙方之間形成的法律關系。幫工人因幫工活動遭受人身損害的，被幫工人應當承擔賠償責任
【基本事實】
原告：朱永勝。
被告：安徽省東至縣世平液化氣有限責任公司。
法定代表人：周世平，該公司經理。
原告朱永勝因與被告東至縣世平液化氣有限責任公司(以下簡稱世平公司)發生人身損害賠償糾紛，向安徽省東至縣人民法院提起訴訟。
原告朱永勝訴稱：原告系被告世平公司的雇工。2003年8月5日，世平公司客戶錢月英家液化氣打不著火，要求被告下屬的土地局換氣點派人前來維修。當時原告正在該換氣點，聽說此事後，便說該客戶家的液化氣罐是原告檢測的。該換氣點負責人沈革聯當即說：“你檢測的，就應該由你去。”因此原告趕往客戶錢月英家維修。在維修過程中不慎發生燃燒事故，致原告受傷，經鑒定為9級傷殘。原告受被告雇請在工作中受傷，請求判令被告賠償原告的醫療費、誤工費、護理費、交通費、住宿費、住院夥食補助費、營養費共計9717．90元，並賠償原告傷殘補助費17 250．84元。
原告朱永勝提供以下證據：
|
1. The permit to the LPG station which was checked and issued on July 1, 2001, and the conformity certificate of fire prevention safety training which was checked and issued on July 24, 2002. They prove that Fubang LPG Station was established by Shiping Company, and that Zhu attended the fire prevention safety training and was the person in charge of Fubang LPG Station.
| | 1．2001年7月1日核發的液化石油氣換氣點許可證和2002年7月24日核發的消防安全培訓合格證。用以證明富邦換氣點是被告世平公司設立的，原告參加了消防安全培訓，系富邦換氣點負責人。
|
2. A statement made by Shen on August 6, 2003, which proves that Zhu was appointed by Shen to go to Qian's home to make repair, and a combustion accident occurred in the repair.
| | 2．2003年8月6日沈革聯作出的情況說明。用以證明原告去客戶錢月英家維修是受其指派的，在此次維修中發生了燃燒事故。
|
3. Two testimonials issued by Sun Jiexin, Li Zhuo and Liu Guoda, which prove that Fubang LPG Station was Shiping Company's LPG station, and Zhu was a hired worker of Shiping Company.
| | 3．孫傑鑫、李茁、劉國大出具的證明二份。用以證明富邦換氣點是世平公司的換氣點，原告是世平公司的職工。
|
4. Three statements issued by Yang Jinhua, Zhou Ping, Deng Fanqin and Fang Qing, which prove that Qian was Shiping Company's customer, and was also injured in the repair of the LPG tank.
| | 4．楊金花、周平、鄧凡琴、方慶出具的情況說明三份。用以證明錢月英系被告的客戶，亦在此次液化氣修理過程中被燒傷。
|
5. A company establishment registration check form, which proves that Shiping Company also ran repair business.
| | 5．公司設立登記審核表一份。用以證明被告有維修業務。
|
6. A video tape and an audio tape, which proves that Shen appointed Zhu to go to Qian's home to make repair, and that the safety liability of the LPG station at the land bureau and that of the LPG station at Yaoliang Saleroom should be borne by Shiping Company.
| | 6．錄像帶、錄音帶兩盤。用以證明沈革聯指派原告去錢月英家維修的事實，以及土地局換氣點和堯糧門市部換氣點的安全責任由被告承擔。
|
7. Two receipts of medical expenses and a leaving-hospital settlement slip, which prove that Zhu spent 5,952.90 yuan of medical expenses due to the injury.
| | 7．醫藥費收據二張及出院小結一份。用以證明原告因傷花去醫藥費5952．90元。
|
8. No. 81 (2004) civil judgment of the Intermediate People's Court of Chizhou Municipality, and No. 95 (2004) letter of judicial technical authentication, which prove that Qian was injured in repairing the LPG tank, and Shiping Company should bear the liability for compensation; and meanwhile prove that Zhu's injury constituted disability of Grade 9.
| | 8．池州市中級人民法院(2004)池民一終字第81號民事判決書、(2004)池法鑒字第95號司法技術鑒定書。用以證明錢月英在維修液化氣過程中受傷，被告對此承擔賠償責任。同時證明原告的傷情構成9級傷殘。
|
9. A notification on no acceptance which was issued by Dongzhi County Labor Dispute Arbitration Committee. It proves that Zhu had applied for arbitration, but the application was not accepted by the arbitration institution.
Shiping Company argued that Zhu was neither its hired worker nor its employee. In addition, Zhu's medical expenses were not checked, and the loss due to missed working time and the compensation were not accurately calculated.
Shiping Company provided the following items of evidence:
| | 9．東至縣勞動爭議仲裁委員會不予受理通知書一份。證明原告已申請仲裁，但未被仲裁機構受理。
被告世平公司辯稱：原告朱永勝不是被告的職工，也不是被告雇員。另外，原告的醫療費未經審核，誤工、賠償標准計算不准確。
被告世平公司提供了如下證據：
|
1. A permit to the LPG station, which proves that Fubang LPG Station stopped its business in the end of 2002.
| | 1．液化石油氣換氣點許可證一份。用以證明富邦換氣點已于2002年底停止經營。
|
2. A testimonial of Dongzhi County Construction Bureau, which proves that Li Zhuo was the person in charge of Fubang LPG Station.
In order to find out the facts, Dongzhi County Court accessed the following materials:
| | 2．東至縣建設局證明一份。用以證明富邦換氣點負責人為李茁。
為查明事實，東至縣人民法院調取以下材料：
|
1. Shiping Company's name list for payment of wages of the period from April 2001 to August, 2003, which proves that Zhu's name was not on the name list.
| | 1．被告世平公司2001年4月至2003年8月份工資發放花名冊一份。證明原告朱永勝的姓名不在工資花名冊上。
|
2. A testimonial of Dongzhi County Fire Prevention Detachment of Public Security, which proves that Zhu entered for the training on June 5, 2002 in the identity of a practitioner of Fubang LPG Station in Dongzhi County.
．．．．．． | | 2．東至縣公安消防大隊證明一份。證明原告于2002年6月5日以東至縣富邦液化氣換氣點從業人員的身份報名參加培訓。
經東至縣人民法院組織質證，雙方當事人對原告朱永勝提供的證據5、7、8、9及法院調取的證據2無異議，法院予以確認。對原告提供的證據1，被告世平公司有異議，認為富邦換氣點的許可證是2001年核發的，因2002年未參加年審，當年底該換氣點便已停業，且該換氣點與被告訂立的合同年限是一年，早已過期。對于原告于 2002年以富邦換氣點從業人員的名義報名參加培訓一事，被告並不知曉。法院認為，鑒于雙方當事人對法院調取的證據2無異議，故可以認定2002年6月6日朱永勝以世平公司富邦換氣點從業人員的身份參加了池州市消防支隊在東至縣舉辦的從業人員培訓班。富邦換氣點因未參加年檢、變更負責人亦未向主管部門申請批准等原因，于2002年底停止經營。對原告提供的證據2、6，被告有異議，認為沈革聯無權指派、事實上也從未指派原告去錢月英家維修，沈革聯當時僅僅是接原告的話隨口說“是你檢測的你就去”。法院認為，被告下屬的土地局換氣點設有維修業務，接到客戶提出的維修請求後是否派人前去維修，作為該換氣點的負責人，沈革聯有權作出決定。原告在該換氣點得知錢月英家液化氣打不著火需要維修這一事實後，便稱錢月英家的液化氣瓶是他檢測的。當時無其他維修人員在場，沈革聯隨即說“是你檢測的你就去看看”。對于上述事實雙方並無異議，因此對原告提供的這兩份證據予以確認。對原告提供的證據4，被告有異議，認為錢月英是原告個人的客戶，並非被告的客戶。法院認為，被告沒有提供證據證明錢月英是原告個人的客戶，同時該證據是幾位證人出具的證明，且與其他證據互相印證，故予以采信。對原告提供的證據3，被告有異議，認為該證據證明力不足，不能充分證明原告是被告的職工。法院認為，該證人證言不能充分證明原告是被告職工，原告也沒有提供其他證據予以佐證。被告異議成立，對該證據不予采信。對法院調取的證據1，原告有異議，認為被告有可能對工資表作了變動處理。法院認為，該證據系法院依法取得，原告未能提供相反的證據來推翻該證據，故原告異議不成立。
．．．．．． |
Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com
| |
您好：您現在要進入的是北大法律英文網會員專區，如您是我們英文用戶可直接 登錄，進入會員專區查詢您所需要的信息；如您還不是我們 的英文用戶，請注冊並交納相應費用成為我們的英文會員 。如有問題請來電咨詢；
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | |
| | | |