|
|
|
Gao v. Wang (Dispute over House Leasing Contracts)——Landlord's Refusal to Lease Apartment Due to Concealed Cohabitation of Disabled Elder Dismissed by Court as Unjustified
|
|
高某与王某房屋租赁合同纠纷案——房东以未告知“高龄失能老人”同住为由拒绝交房 法院：不具合理依据 有违社会主义核心价值观
|
|
【法宝引证码】
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Gao v. Wang (Dispute over House Leasing Contracts) | | 高某与王某房屋租赁合同纠纷案 |
| ——Landlord's Refusal to Lease Apartment Due to Concealed Cohabitation of Disabled Elder Dismissed by Court as Unjustified | | ——房东以未告知“高龄失能老人”同住为由拒绝交房 法院：不具合理依据 有违社会主义核心价值观 |
| A landlord refused to lease his apartment to tenants, alleging they had concealed the cohabitation of a disabled elderly person and committed fraud. Here are two key questions: Does the landlord have grounds for refusal? Do tenants commit fraud? | | 房东以租客未告知同住人中有“高龄失能老人”为由，认为租客构成欺诈，拒绝交付房屋。出租人的拒绝是否有依据？租客是否构成欺诈？ |
| [Case Review] | | 【案情回放】 |
| Mr. Gao, one of the tenants, signed the Housing Lease Contractwith Mr. Wang, the landlord. The tenants included Mr. Gao, his wife, children, mother-in-law, an elderly person from his mother-in-law's family, and a caregiver. After the conclusion of this contract, Mr. Gao paid an initial rent and a deposit. The next day, Mr. Wang discovered that the elderly person was 94 years old and unable to take care of himself upon inquiry. Mr. Wang accused Mr. Gao of concealing significant information about the disabled elder, constituting fraud, and refused to deliver the apartment. He filed a lawsuit in the People's Court to rescind the contract and demanded compensation from Mr. Gao. In response, Mr. Gao lodged a counterclaim, seeking the court's acknowledgment of the contract's validity and penalties from Mr. Wang for breach of contract. | | 租客高某与房东王某签订《房屋租赁合同》，租住人员包括高某及其妻子、孩子、岳母、岳母家中一位老人以及护理人员。双方签订《房屋租赁合同》后，高某支付了首期租金及押金。合同签订后次日，王某询问老人情况，得知老人94岁、生活不能自理。王某以租客为“高龄失能老人”为由，认为高某隐瞒同住人的重要信息，构成欺诈，拒绝向高某交付房屋，并向人民法院起诉，请求撤销《房屋租赁合同》，由高某赔偿损失。高某提起反诉，请求确认《房屋租赁合同》已生效，并由王某支付违约金。 |
| ．．．．．． | | 【以案说法】 |
| | 上海市第一中级人民法院经审理认为，《房屋租赁合同》签订后，以租客为“高龄失能老人”为由拒绝交房，有违社会主义核心价值观，不利于建立和谐友善的社会秩序，有损老年人权益。王某也未能证明其将同住人不能有“高龄失能老人”作为签订租赁合同的关键因素予以考量。故人民法院驳回了王某的诉讼请求，支持了高某的反诉请求，判决王某承担违约责任。 |
| | ．．．．．． |
Dear visitor,you are attempting to view a subscription-based section of lawinfochina.com. If you are already a subscriber, please login to enjoy access to our databases . If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe . Should you have any questions, please contact us at:
+86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
Mobile: +86 133-1157-0713
Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
database@chinalawinfo.com
| |
您好：您现在要进入的是北大法律英文网会员专区，如您是我们英文用户可直接 登录，进入会员专区查询您所需要的信息；如您还不是我们 的英文用户，请注册并交纳相应费用成为我们的英文会员 。如有问题请来电咨询；
Tel: +86 (10) 82689699, +86 (10) 82668266 ext. 153
Mobile: +86 13311570713
Fax: +86 (10) 82668268
E-mail: database@chinalawinfo.com
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message: Please kindly comment on the present translation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translations are by lawinfochina.com, and we retain exclusive copyright over content
found on our website except for content we publish as authorized by respective copyright
owners or content that is publicly available from government sources.
Due to differences in language, legal systems, and culture, English translations
of Chinese law are for reference purposes only. Please use the official Chinese-language
versions as the final authority. lawinfochina.com and its staff will not be directly
or indirectly liable for use of materials found on this website.
We welcome your comments and suggestions, which assist us in continuing to improve
the quality of our materials.
|
|
| |
|
|